So, a couple of weeks ago, one of
my teachers was talking about the incarnation of Jesus Christ [the doctrine of
Jesus becoming man]. Though this does not pertain to the subject matter of the
class, the topic, nevertheless, came up. He briefly explained it and was then
about to move on when one of my fellow classmates chimed in. Here is what the
student said:
One of the best ways that I have ever heard it explained was that Michael the
archangel came down from Heaven and placed the seed of the Holy Spirit into
Mary’s womb.
Quick Note
Any time you say that what you
are about to say is the “best” thing you have ever heard, it better be both
good and correct. Otherwise, everyone else will surely be thinking twice about
your theology. Actually, it would probably be better to just allow the audience
to decide which illustrations are the best.
The Quote
Okay, back on track. Does that
quote from the Seminary student bother you? If so, then why?
Here’s why that quote should not
settle well in your soul:
1. Michael the Archangel is never mentioned anywhere near the birth of Christ in the recorded
Scriptures. I am not saying that he is uninvolved, but only that the recorded
information regarding any angelic participation [outside of Gabriel (Luke 1:19,
26)] is non-existent. Michael is only mentioned twice in the New Testament
(Jude 1:9; Rev. 12:7) and neither example is close in proximity.
2. It is not
the seed of the Holy Spirit, but the seed of the woman. The first-ever-given
Gospel proclamation was very clear that it would be the woman’s seed (Genesis
3:15).
3. Finally, Scripture does not say that an angel
placed Jesus into Mary. Rather, the angel Gabriel told Mary in Luke 1:35, “…The
Holy Spirit will come upon you….” There seems to be no room for angelic
activity in this operation. It was purely a God-ordained orchestration.
Conclusion
What was the result? Well, the
student was encouraged to hold beliefs like that loosely, but I am inclined to
acknowledge that belief as heresy. Why am I so strong on this? The reason is
because there is no Biblical basis for that belief. In truth, it is
counter-Biblical [i.e. it stands against the written-down revelation of God]. It is anti-Scriptural.
It reminds me of a quote from
Star Wars VIII when Luke asks Rey a question about the force:
Luke Skywalker: What do you know about the force?
Rey: It's a power that Jedi have that lets them control people and...
make things float.
Luke Skywalker: Impressive. Every word in that sentence was wrong.
Therefore,
upon further reflection of the student’s quote, every word of that sentence was
wrong. This is just another example of why, no matter what level of authority a
person holds or where they went to school, you should always hold up what they
say to Scripture and not just accept it blindly.
* To read another example of interpretation gone awry by one of my classmates, check out this previous blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment